ESTAR: strona spółki
26.07.2021, 12:53
EST extraordinary announcement
ENEFI Asset Management Plc (“Company”) hereby informs its Honourable Investors that the
action filed by the parties involved against the decision (H-PJ-III-B-3/2017.) of MNB in the subject of influencing the market and insider trading has been rejected by the Metropolitan Court of Justice in its repeated proceedings. 1. As the company had disclosed, MNB had charged a fine (https://www.mnb.hu/felugyelet/felugyeleti-keretrendszer/felugyeleti-hirek/hirekujdonsagok/ szazhuszmillios-jegybanki-birsag-piacbefolyasolas-es-bennfentes-kereskedelemmiatt) for influencing the market and insider trading. 2. The fined parties exercised legal remedy against the resolution due to the lack of grounds thereof. The Metropolitan Court of Justice overrode the condemning decision of MNB in 2019 and ordered the authority to conduct new proceedings. 3. MNB exercised legal remedy against the decision, requesting the Curia to reject the decision. The Curia did not reject the action of the claimants but did not make a decision in the subject of the case however overrode the resolution of the Metropolitan Court of Justice and ordered the court to conduct new proceedings referring to the fact that the court shall judge the case without being ordered to conduct new proceedings. 4. The Metropolitan Court of Justice rejected the action filed by the claimant in the repeated proceedings. The parties do not accept the decision of the Metropolitan Court of Justice made in the repeated proceedings and shall exercise legal remedy against it.
action filed by the parties involved against the decision (H-PJ-III-B-3/2017.) of MNB in the subject of influencing the market and insider trading has been rejected by the Metropolitan Court of Justice in its repeated proceedings. 1. As the company had disclosed, MNB had charged a fine (https://www.mnb.hu/felugyelet/felugyeleti-keretrendszer/felugyeleti-hirek/hirekujdonsagok/ szazhuszmillios-jegybanki-birsag-piacbefolyasolas-es-bennfentes-kereskedelemmiatt) for influencing the market and insider trading. 2. The fined parties exercised legal remedy against the resolution due to the lack of grounds thereof. The Metropolitan Court of Justice overrode the condemning decision of MNB in 2019 and ordered the authority to conduct new proceedings. 3. MNB exercised legal remedy against the decision, requesting the Curia to reject the decision. The Curia did not reject the action of the claimants but did not make a decision in the subject of the case however overrode the resolution of the Metropolitan Court of Justice and ordered the court to conduct new proceedings referring to the fact that the court shall judge the case without being ordered to conduct new proceedings. 4. The Metropolitan Court of Justice rejected the action filed by the claimant in the repeated proceedings. The parties do not accept the decision of the Metropolitan Court of Justice made in the repeated proceedings and shall exercise legal remedy against it.